<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chad Moriyama &#187; Mark Feinsand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chadmoriyama.com/tag/mark-feinsand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chadmoriyama.com</link>
	<description>Dodgers, Sabermetrics, Scouting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:28:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>[Updated] Dodgers are shopping Andre Ethier and could replace him with Nick Swisher</title>
		<link>http://www.chadmoriyama.com/2012/12/dodgers-are-shopping-andre-ethier-according-to-sources/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chadmoriyama.com/2012/12/dodgers-are-shopping-andre-ethier-according-to-sources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Moriyama</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andre Ethier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Heyman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Rosenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Dodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Feinsand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Petriello]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Swisher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chadmoriyama.com/?p=13227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Dodgers are shopping right fielder Andre Ethier, according to Mark Feinsand of the New York Daily News, and that could mean they&#8217;re in the hunt for Nick Swisher to serve as his replacement in right. Normally, this wouldn&#8217;t be enough to warrant a post, but Mike Petriello said he heard similar yesterday afternoon, so ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.chadmoriyama.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/AndreEthierBall.jpg" alt="AndreEthierBall" width="458" height="302" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7513" /></p>
<p>The <strong>Dodgers</strong> are shopping right fielder <strong>Andre Ethier</strong>, <a href="https://twitter.com/FeinsandNYDN/status/281037634464251907" target="_blank">according</a> to <strong>Mark Feinsand</strong> of the <strong>New York Daily News</strong>, and that could mean they&#8217;re in the hunt for <strong>Nick Swisher</strong> to serve as his replacement in right. Normally, this wouldn&#8217;t be enough to warrant a post, but <strong>Mike Petriello</strong> <a href="https://twitter.com/mike_petriello/status/281041683746013184" target="_blank">said he heard</a> similar yesterday afternoon, so the rumor appears to have legs.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>The news marks a surprising turn of events given that Ethier <a href="http://www.chadmoriyama.com/2012/06/andre-ethier-agrees-to-5-year85-million-contract-with-6th-year-option-analysis/" target="_blank">just signed a five-year extension for $85 million six months ago</a>, but nothing regarding this team under the new ownership should be seen as truly shocking anymore.</p>
<p>As far as Ethier&#8217;s value goes, what is it? Not much, really, because with an AAV of $17 million, he&#8217;s already being paid above market value. However, in a vacuum, Ethier is a solidly above-average player, which would absolutely carry value if his contract was more reasonable. As such, the assumption here would be that in order to get a return on him, the Dodgers would have to eat a significant portion of his contract, thus making him attractive to a potential suitor.</p>
<p>Swisher ties into this drama because he&#8217;s basically the last corner outfield option left for those that missed out on <strong>Josh Hamilton</strong> and friends, so it&#8217;s no surprise that he&#8217;s drawing interest from the <strong>Red Sox</strong>, <strong>Phillies</strong>, <strong>Mariners</strong>, <strong>Rangers</strong>, and <strong>Orioles</strong>. However, that interest level is probably why Ethier is on the block, because Ethier is a similar player to Swisher, except almost two years younger.</p>
<p>But why would the Dodgers be interested in replacing Ethier with Swisher? I&#8217;m not totally sure, because they&#8217;re basically the same player except Ethier is younger. Swisher has a 125 OPS+ the past three years compared to Ethier&#8217;s 126, and their defense and baserunning are about pushes. The primary difference in their lines is that Ethier has a severe platoon split (.913 RHP/.649 LHP), while Swisher doesn&#8217;t (.820 RHP/.842 LHP). While that does carry some value, at the end of the day, it&#8217;s the player&#8217;s total contribution to the team that matters (WAR), and they&#8217;re about the same in that aspect.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Look, I certainly wasn&#8217;t a fan of the extension that Ethier was signed to, but these potential deals surely aren&#8217;t being done with the thought of saving money by signing Swisher and dealing Ethier, at least if the payroll situation is to be believed. As such, it&#8217;s about the better player, and from that perspective, I see little value in making this trade unless there&#8217;s significant return for Ethier. That, of course, is always a possibility, but I remain skeptical since I certainly wouldn&#8217;t do it as an opposing GM.</p>
<p>Remember, if you guys don&#8217;t want him, then what makes you think other teams will be clamoring to give up significant pieces to get him? Cuts both ways.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p><strong>Update 1</strong>: <strong>Ken Rosenthal</strong> <a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/los-angeles-dodgers-andre-ethier-trade-rumors-outfielder-may-target-nick-swisher-michael-bourn-free-agents-121812" target="_blank">has confirmed the report</a> and has added details.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Dodgers are shopping Ethier, major-league sources say — and their intent might be to clear a spot for a free agent such as first baseman/outfielder Nick Swisher or center fielder Michael Bourn.</p>
<p>However, one official with knowledge of the Dodgers’ thinking says that the talks about Ethier originated from inquiries by two American League clubs, and that the Dodgers are not actively pursuing a deal.</p>
<p>That official says that the renewed interest in Ethier stems from the shrinking pool of available hitters on both the free-agent and trade markets.</p>
<p>The Dodgers have “zero intention” of trading Ethier, the official said, but will listen to offers. The discussions, to this point, have failed to progress.</p>
<p>Whatever the Dodgers’ intentions, it seems doubtful that any team would take Ethier’s new contract in its entirety. He is a career .238 hitter against left-handed pitching.</p>
<p>But, in the words of one source who has been in contact with the Dodgers, “I wouldn’t put anything past them. They’ve got so much money, they don’t care.”</p></blockquote>
<p>I have no idea why the Dodgers would have no intention of trading Ethier, honestly. If possible I would like to replace him with a better player, but I just don&#8217;t think Swisher is all that different.</p>
<p><strong>Update 2</strong>: Mike Petriello <a href="https://twitter.com/mike_petriello/status/281057027864797184" target="_blank">says</a> the Mariners and Rangers are two of the teams that asked about Ethier.</p>
<p><strong>Update 3</strong>: <strong>Jon Heyman</strong> <a href="https://twitter.com/JonHeymanCBS/status/281066942448685058" target="_blank">says</a> that the Dodgers talked with Swisher but that it was weeks ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chadmoriyama.com/2012/12/dodgers-are-shopping-andre-ethier-according-to-sources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
