Dodgers TV rights close to being awarded to FOX for $6 billion to $7 billion over 25 years

The Dodgers television contract will total between $6 billion and $7 billion over a 25-year span, thus potentially tripling the sale price of the team, according to Deadline‘s Nikki Finke.

Insiders tell me that Fox Sports is close to clinching the exclusive TV rights for the Los Angeles Dodgers by paying between $6 billion and $7 billion over 25 years to put the team on its regional sports network in Southern California and of course its national Fox Broadcasting Company. Fox already shows the games on its Prime Ticket local cable channel but also has Fox Sports West here.

So for those counting, just by taking the middle ground of that estimate, it puts the Dodgers television revenue at $260 million per year or $220 million more per year than they had been receiving annually ($40 million).

If true, that sort of makes a mockery of all the people who were borderline outraged at the $2.15 billion price tag of the team when it was awarded to Guggenheim Partners.


The deal is still at risk of not getting done though, as FOX has apparently set a deadline.

I’m told a deal came “very close” to being done about a week ago “and then it went a little bit south”. To rattle Guggenheim’s cages, Fox Sports delivered an ultimatum that a deal had to be done by the end of this month or else it would stop negotiating. (Terms like “It’s dead” and “We’re out” were used.) The Fox Sports gambit worked. Because it would have left Guggenheim in a terrible situation without multiple bidders and with little leverage for next-in-line Time Warner Cable since CBS, Comcast/NBC, ABC/ESPN and even the MSG Network (controlled by the owners of Cablevision) never materialized. Of course, Guggenheim could have opted for the Dodgers to start its own network, as the Mets and Yankees have done. But big rewards come with big risks.

While I’m not sure the situation would be as bleak as Finke tries to paint it, it certainly seems a tad insane to be paying the rumored price, and I doubt they could get that kind of a money from anybody else, so FOX probably does have the leverage to make the demand in question.


With that said, while I realize Finke is Deadline’s editor-in-chief, I have no idea how credible she is, but stuff like this makes me more skeptical than I want to be:

But the sheer greed of Guggenheim’s ask on this new deal is staggering, especially when you consider it will all get passed down to the cable systems, advertisers, and ultimately consumers. The alternative for Guggenheim included higher ticket prices which would serve to only further alienate fans. Plus the new owners claim to need the money to bribe talented players to come to the mediocre Dodgers. And then there’s the sad fact that Major League Baseball teams are shifting from broadcast TV to cable networks – so fewer games will be available on free TV. Fox Sports expects to broadcast only one or two Major League Baseball games a week for the national audience next season.

The amount of editorializing in that news story is … weird. She has a point, sure, but it’s not as if this is a new trend started by the Dodgers with FOX or something, as Mike Petriello pointed out in his own writings on the subject.

Heck, she points out as much in her own story:

Freer really knows this business – he ran the Fox regional sports networks for nearly half a decade – and knows not to overpay. He’s not when you consider that the Dodgers will play 162 games when the season starts in April. And yet TV rights to the Lakers who play 82 games just sold to Time Warner Cable for $3B over 20 years. And Fox just paid $3B for 49% of the YES Network which owns TV rights to the New York Yankees for 20 years. Considering that Fox also has the right to own 80% of YES (and will surely exercise that option), then $6B-$7B for this Dodgers deal sounds about about right given the hyper-inflated finances of sports TV rights. In the era of DVR, Hulu, Netflix and other ways to watch TV, sports viewers (overwhelmingly male) watch live and therefore don’t always skip through ads.

So I’m not seeing the reason for outrage at this specific deal.


As far as the team goes, this would go a long way to assuaging any doubt or apprehension about the team’s payroll both now and in the future. The Dodgers would be setup to spend and spend big for a long while, and when the ink hits the paper, it’ll truly mark the beginning of a new era.

Up until now, people have just been doing a lot of optimistic assuming, but if this story holds up, it looks like all that optimism will finally be justified.

About Chad Moriyama